We use cookies to give you the best online experience. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. Learn more here.Close Me
I've supported renewable energy for more than 30 years, even
before my years as legal counsel for the Ministry of
Energy. And I'm a strong supporter of the Green Energy Act. But every type of
energy generation has drawbacks, and none of them are suitable
everywhere.
Most solar, wind and biomass renewable energy projects need renewable energy approvals under the
Environmental Protection Act. But there is a different
approval system for small hydro projects, focussed on a twin
process of class environmental assessment which must be submitted
to the Ministry of the Environment, and site release by the Ministry of Natural
Resources. This process is proving very challenging, for
proponents and opponents alike.
Xeneca, for example, is a waterpower developer
funded by the Ontario Pension Trust, which was awarded 19 of
the 47 Feed In Tariff contracts for potential waterpower sites
across Ontario, more than any other developer. None of its sites,
so far, have been approved, although senior Ministry of Natural
Resources staff meet monthly with Xeneca to review its progress. In
March, the Ministry of the Environment Approvals Branch firmly
rejected Xeneca's claims to have completed adequate
environmental assessments of its first three projects:
Other projects, such as Xeneca's plan to dam Sturgeon
Chutes, just above French River Provincial Park, are also
encountering fierce opposition from local residents, businesses and First Nations. Local
people and their experts have been explaining, for years, that the
dam would cause significant damage to endangered species, including
a sturgeon spawning area, to public safety, and to river water
quality and quantity, among other problems. The Henvey Inlet First
Nation has flatly refused to permit the project, which is close to
at least one grave site and other areas of cultural significance.
If Xeneca is listening, it's hard to tell.
Such projects are not a good fit for the "green"
promises of either Xeneca or OP Trust. Some places just should not
be dammed.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
In Lameman v. Alberta, 2013 ABCA 148, the Alberta Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal by the Crown in Right of Alberta ("Alberta") and the Attorney General of Canada ("Canada") from a decision of the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench refusing to strike portions of the Statement of Claim of the Beaver Lake Cree Nation ("BLCN").
In a recent judgment by the Court of Québec which may raise a few eyebrows, an investigator hired by an employer to inquire into psychological harassment complaints was ordered to pay an alleged harasser moral damages for pain and suffering.
Utilities, energy providers, trade associations and other entities participating in or supporting the energy sector will be impacted by Canada's new Anti-Spam Legislation.
Over the past few years, mining companies have become increasingly aware of the potential civil and criminal liability arising from the payment of bribes to foreign government officials.
On March 28th, Québec Environment minister Yves-François Blanchet announced that the Bureau d’audiences publiques sur l’environnement (BAPE) will hold public hearings on the uranium sector in Québec.
The Québec Minister of Finance and the Economy, Nicolas Marceau, with the Québec Minister of Natural Resources, Martine Ouellet, have recently made public the new mining tax regime for Québec, a fiscal measure that will apply to an operator’s fiscal year that begins after December 31, 2013.