We use cookies to give you the best online experience. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. Learn more here.Close Me
Virtual desktops running on the cloud (Desktop-as-a-Service or
DaaS, if you need another acronym) have delivered desktop-style
computing to mobile devices such as iPads and Android tablets. This
is a way to remotely access the full functionality of a desktop
(such as track-changes in MS Word, which is currently impossible on
an iPad). This is the subject of a recent spat between OnLive,
tuCloud and Microsoft. This dispute - a dramatic one in which tuCloud openly dared Microsoft to sue
it - has focussed attention on the fine-print in
Microsoft's licensing regime under its Service Provider License
Agreement. In a broader sense, it impacts any virtualization. When
can a licensee of software deliver virtual access to multiple
instances of that software, and how does the software vendor
control such access?
This dispute is one which will be watched closely as it
develops. Software vendors should review their terms and their
licensing models to ensure that they have contractual terms that
match the current virtualization risks and opportunities that come
with DaaS.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
In a cautionary tale to be heeded by patent drafters, the Supreme Court of Canada held that Pfizer’s patent directed to sildenafil, better known as Viagra, is invalid.
The recent decision in Overstock v. New York Taxation and Finance paved the way for an interesting conclusion on the taxing power of New York State - and by extension, the sales tax that may be applied to many online sales, including sales by Canadian online business into the US market.
In Pelchat v. Zone 3 Inc., 2013 QCCS 78, a Quebec court decision has addressed the dichotomy between the idea for a TV show, and the "form and expression" of ideas, as embodied in a TV show.
The Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) program has been a phenomenal success in Canada and has positioned the country as a highly cost-effective jurisdiction in which to procure patent protection with speed and efficacy.
The advantages of trade-mark registration are self-evident for both franchisors and their franchisees who are licensees of the mark, and should be considered a mandatory first step on the road to franchising a business.